| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Alignment size? |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:15:39 -0400 |
| Cc: | Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100813113915.GD10429@dastard> |
| References: | <4C64715F.8060000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100812234911.GC10429@dastard> <4C64E52E.2060806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100813113915.GD10429@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:39:15PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The workaround old versions of mkfs.xfs used was to create the fs > with a sector size of 4k when it detected md raid5 underneath it so > the sb and ag headers were all 4k aligned and sized, just like the > rest of the filesystem.... That workaround is still in latests mkfs.xfs if you build against the internal libdisk instead of libblkid. And that's the case at least for Debian, and probably a few other distributions as well. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | fs corruption not detected by xfs_check or _repair, Marco Maisenhelder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fs corruption not detected by xfs_check or _repair, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Alignment size?, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Alignment size?, Michael Tokarev |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |