| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:05:35 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <201008121346.30760.eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <201008121346.30760.eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.35-zmi; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Donnerstag, 12. August 2010 Khelben Blackstaff wrote: > Here is my post with the results of the benchmark. > http://lordkhelben.wordpress.com/2010/07/08/xfs-delayed-logging/ Wow, BTRFS rocks. I guess I'll use it once it's released. But I'm stunned that XFS is that much slower than ext4 in many tests. -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 ****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ****** http://www.it-podcast.at/aktuelle-sendung.html // Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests 228: suppress core dump message, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in, Peter Niemayer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in, Khelben Blackstaff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in, Peter Niemayer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |