[Top] [All Lists]

Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a r

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:31:21 +0200
In-reply-to: <i3ul1b$d3b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <i3rt4t$46c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201008111428.31196@xxxxxx> <i3ul1b$d3b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.35-zmi; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
On Mittwoch, 11. August 2010 Peter Niemayer wrote:
> I think after the "ext2"-age no serious file system ever had
> a real problem dealing with lots of files in one directory -
> or do you have contradicting information?
IIRC 2010 there was someone on this list reporting problems when a 
certain amount of files were created in a dir. He had to do with 
audio/video recording, where delays are important (not to have). At one 
point file creating time increased a lot, but I don't remember if it was 
a filesystem problem or something else. But as it was the only report I 
saw, I'd say you are right and a big number of files per dir doesn't 
matter anymore.

mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Aktuelles Radiointerview! ******

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>