| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application |
| From: | Peter Niemayer <niemayer@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:01:31 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <201008111428.31196@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <i3rt4t$46c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201008111003.36890@xxxxxx> <i3trg6$eps$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201008111428.31196@xxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
On 08/11/2010 02:28 PM, Michael Monnerie wrote: Thank you. Are those files located within one dir or do you use a hash structure like squid cache does? There's only a shallow hierarchy (for functional, not for distribution reasons), so the relevant directories have thousands of files in them. I think after the "ext2"-age no serious file system ever had a real problem dealing with lots of files in one directory - or do you have contradicting information? Regards, Peter Niemayer |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application, Peter Niemayer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application, Michael Monnerie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: observed significant performance improvement using "delaylog" in a real-world application, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |