| To: | Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 4k sector drives |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:50:34 +0200 |
| Cc: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100723133843.GA3397@xxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <201007211333.48363.eye.of.the.8eholder@xxxxxxxxx> <201007230809.28111@xxxxxx> <20100723095832.GA23174@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201007231259.11714@xxxxxx> <4C4994CB.2050200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100723133843.GA3397@xxxxxxx> |
Le Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:38:43 +0200
Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@xxxxxxx> écrivait:
> Only for writes, reads are for practically unaffected.
Sequential writes may be relatively unaffected too; if you write
sequentially a couple of megabytes you'll have only a couple of
additional blocks at the beginning and end of operation.
However random and small IOs should be seriously hit.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 4k sector drives, Matthias Schniedermeyer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |