| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfsprogs: CFLAGS not passed in |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 02:16:07 -0400 |
| Cc: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100722222900.GB32635@dastard> |
| References: | <201007220821.44314@xxxxxx> <20100722222900.GB32635@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 08:29:00AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The OPTIMIZER compile options are still included here, so there's > potential conflict just by dumbly initialising CFLAGS.... Given that gcc always takes the latests of a set of conflicting option just aqdding the flags from configure last should fix it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4k sector drives, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: filesystem shrinks after using xfs_repair, Eli Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfsprogs: CFLAGS not passed in, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | High latencies writing to a memory mapped file, Shawn Bohrer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |