| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: reclaim bug fixes |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:23:29 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1279154300-2018-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1279154300-2018-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:38:15AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > The following patches fix excessive CPU consumption during inode > cache shrinking when filesystems have lots of allocation groups as > well as prevent a couple of lockdep reports that were found during > testing. Also included is a fix for a reclaim recursion deadlock > when allocating memory during inode initialisation. Wa the overlap of patch 1 with the for-2.6.35 shrinker series intentional? In addition to patch 1 patches 3 to 5 are also for-2.6.35 material in my opinion. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: fix memory reclaim recursion deadlock on locked inode buffer, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix aio completion vs unwritten extents, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/5] xfs: fix xfs_trans_add_item() lockdep warnings, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: reclaim bug fixes, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |