[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: reclaim bug fixes

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: reclaim bug fixes
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:23:29 -0400
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1279154300-2018-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1279154300-2018-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:38:15AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> The following patches fix excessive CPU consumption during inode
> cache shrinking when filesystems have lots of allocation groups as
> well as prevent a couple of lockdep reports that were found during
> testing. Also included is a fix for a reclaim recursion deadlock
> when allocating memory during inode initialisation.

Wa the overlap of patch 1 with the for-2.6.35 shrinker series
intentional?  In addition to patch 1 patches 3 to 5 are also for-2.6.35
material in my opinion.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>