xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH xfstests] _qmount: mount w/o selinux xattrs

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfstests] _qmount: mount w/o selinux xattrs
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:13:46 +1000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4C3B6D0A.2010708@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4C2CF34F.7070008@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100702071006.GB30776@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C2E2687.3080700@xxxxxxxxxx> <20100709161232.GA26302@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C3B6D0A.2010708@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:29:14PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 11:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:55PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> What about just disabling selinux for all filesystems instead of just
> >>> XFS for the general case.
> >>
> >> Well it seems like if we -can- test with it on, that's good.
> >> Certain distros ship with it on by default, so exercising lots
> >> of scenarios with it on seems beneficial...
> > 
> > It seems, but I'd rather do it consistently for all filesystems.
> > 
> 
> except we can't, because xfs actually has such low-level format checking
> that selinux -will- break it badly.
> 
> I guess we could flag which tests can't run w/ extra xattrs,
> and only mount w/ the context for those?

Maybe use a group to define all the tests that can't run with
selinux enabled and check it before running each test? i.e. use
notrun to prevent such tests from running. The attr group isprobably
a good start for the tests that will break w/ selinux enabled....

Cheers.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>