xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:52:47 -0400
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100712024104.GD25335@dastard>
References: <1274777588-21494-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100702121304.GA10075@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100712024104.GD25335@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a
> context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e.  the
> original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which
> combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst
> retaining the stability of the courrent code....

That approach sounds good to me.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>