| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Slow delete |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Jul 2010 14:54:06 -0400 |
| Cc: | Andrei Deftu <andreideftu@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100705171338.3bb38e1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <AANLkTinPmhJRD3CDdsHtkLFzYd2jF9ee7gPqgO6XBSfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100705171338.3bb38e1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
Using nobarrier really is a bad idea in general as it does not actually provides any transactional guarantee. But if you're the kind of person that would use it anyway please upgrade to a 2.6.35-rc kernel and use the "delaylog" mount option, which will uses a new logging mechanism that will get you much better delete performance. It's still experimental, but it's defintively not any worse than using nobarrier. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Slow delete, Peter Grandi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Volume Group and XFS Partition Recovery, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Slow delete, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Slow delete, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |