xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 03/15] xfs: move DMAPI definitions out of "xfs_mount.h"

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] xfs: move DMAPI definitions out of "xfs_mount.h"
From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:50:02 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100629133500.GA11312@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <201006282204.o5SM4qbU018132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100629133500.GA11312@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: aelder@xxxxxxx
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 09:35 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 05:04:52PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> > XFS defines a bunch of DMAPI cruft in xfs_mount.h.  There is no need
> > for it to be there; move it instead into the xfs_dmapi.h file.  A
> > side-effect of this is that "xfs_dmapi.h" now depends on and needs
> > to be #included after "xfs_mount.h" and "xfs_inode.h" (the latter of
> > which itself depends on a "xfs_bmap_btree.h").
> > 
> > On the other hand, "xfs_dmapi.h" is #included by a LOT more files
> > than it needs to be, so eliminate those cases.
> > 
> > Finally, "xfs_inode.h" defines a type dm_attrs_t that is never
> > referenced anywhere else, so kill it off.
> 
> Asserting copyright on removing single include lines seems rather
> interesting..

I simply updated the copyright on every file I touched.
We've been advised that "SGI" is the new description
of the company in copyright statements, so I was just
doing a blanket update.

I'll keep those changes, but will drop the ones where I
actually added a copyright that wasn't there before.
Looks like only one of the 64 files changed fits that
description ("linux-2.6/xfs_quotaops.c").

                                        -Alex

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH 03/15] xfs: move DMAPI definitions out of "xfs_mount.h", Alex Elder <=