| To: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_restore -R -- recovering a previous restore...does it work? |
| From: | "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:06:22 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <20100630213653.GA26145@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4C2B37D6.50801@xxxxxxxxx> <4C2B6EEE.5050103@xxxxxxxxx> <20100630172750.GA20764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C2B8440.5030503@xxxxxxxxx> <20100630182755.GA23188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C2B96AC.4030009@xxxxxxxxx> <20100630213653.GA26145@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
Chris Wedgwood wrote: how large is the image to be restored?( 2.15TB) out of interest, so smaller images work? I don't know...this was my first time I ever tried it. Usually smaller images don't have so many opportunities to get interrupted. :-) This one took 3h 18m, .. a crappy 189MB/s! I was just unlucky enough to have something interrupt it 3 times in a row (since it was the partition that was corrupt -- I'm a bit scattered as I have no idea what might have caused that partition to go corrupt and no idea if it is just going turn around and happen again. Unfortunately, it's not like it is the easiest partition to backup & restore. Guess I can experiment! ;-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | rsync and corrupt inodes (was xfs_dump problem), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: When it rains it pours...., Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_restore -R -- recovering a previous restore...does it work?, Linda A. Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: When it rains it pours...., Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |