| To: | "Linda A. Walsh" <xfs@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...) |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:16:47 +1000 |
| Cc: | Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4C2A92DA.1020202@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4C26A51F.8020909@xxxxxxxxx> <20100628022744.GX6590@dastard> <4C2A749E.4060006@xxxxxxxxx> <20100629232532.GA24712@dastard> <4C2A87FF.7090804@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C2A92DA.1020202@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 05:42:02PM -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote: > Do I need >32 bit inodes if the filesystem size is > 2T? No. inode64 is recommended for multi-terabyte filesystems, but is not mandatory. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ;-/ (was xfs_dump problem...), Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ;-/ (was xfs_dump problem...), Linda A. Walsh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ;-/ (was xfs_dump problem...), Linda A. Walsh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs file system in process of becoming corrupt; though xfs_repair thinks it's fine! ; -/ (was xfs_dump problem...), Linda A. Walsh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |