On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 13:00 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> If you try running xfstests on lvm volumes which are symlinks,
> it'll fail to run several tests because our _require_scratch
> framework ultimately uses lstat not stat, and does not think
> the lvm device (which is usually a symlink to a dm-X device)
> is a block device. Sigh.
>
> Just calling stat(1) with -L to follow the link should
> suffice.
I wonder whether we'll find stat(1) output ever varies
enough to affect this.
But otherwise this looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/common.rc b/common.rc
> index 6bf1e12..db18884 100644
> --- a/common.rc
> +++ b/common.rc
> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ _is_block_dev()
> exit 1
> fi
>
> - [ -b $1 ] && src/lstat64 $1 | $AWK_PROG '/Device type:/ { print $9 }'
> + [ -b $1 ] && stat -L $1 | $AWK_PROG '/Device type:/ { print $9 }'
> }
>
> # Do a command, log it to $seq.full, optionally test return status
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
|