| To: | Stewart Smith <stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write() |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 May 2010 10:57:14 -0400 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87pr0hbg4g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20100523002023.41f5a5c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100523101856.GL2150@dastard> <20100523092344.0fcaab42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BF9FCA8.8090906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100524143428.6f3a117c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100526070620.GT2150@dastard> <4BFD3926.6040208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100527114736.GA13112@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87pr0hbg4g.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:58:55PM +1000, Stewart Smith wrote: > There is O_DIRECT type functionality available on Windows, with similar > restrictions for aligned IO too. You have to use the Win32 APIs to do it > though, the POSIX ones won't get you it (or more than 2048 files open at > once). > > In practice we've only ever found Solaris (other than linux) to be > reliable with O_DIRECT (at least on UFS... ZFS is... well... I wouldn't > run a database server on it yet). Solaris doesn't support O_DIRECT either, it instead has a separate directio call - just another pointless difference. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write(), Stewart Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write(), Stewart Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write(), Stewart Smith |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write(), Stewart Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |