xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write()

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write()
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:05:09 +0200
In-reply-to: <4BFD3926.6040208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <20100523002023.41f5a5c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100526070620.GT2150@dastard> <4BFD3926.6040208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.12-0.2-vanilla; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
On Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> My apologies for the newbish questions.  If this has all been
>  asked/answered before, please just point me to any papers that
>  explain the pros/cons of o_direct.  Thanks.
 
I'd recommend the kernel pages on http://lwn.net
From time to time you see the discussions about o_direct, always a 
subject of discussion. I'm not a programmer so I don't care ;-)


-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>