| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: noatime,nodiratime? |
| From: | Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 May 2010 16:53:33 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <4BF47859.6020808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | it-management http://it-management.at |
| References: | <4BF3F212.5030600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BF44105.4040902@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4BF47859.6020808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.12-0.2-vanilla; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Donnerstag, 20. Mai 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Yes. It would be nice to see the settings regardless of default or > user defined. I second that. Because you could use barrier in the fstab options, but it's not supported and so nobarrier is used. It would be good to check that by simply "cat /proc/mounts". -- mit freundlichen Grüssen, Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc it-management Internet Services http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee] Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 // Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen: // http://zmi.at/langegg/ // http://zmi.at/haus2009/
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsdump -- not enough memory to dump attributes? w/>20G free -- how much does it need?, Linda A. Walsh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write(), Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: noatime,nodiratime?, Stan Hoeppner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: noatime,nodiratime?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |