| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | noatime,nodiratime? |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 May 2010 09:13:38 -0500 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
Need a little education here. I have a general understanding of what the inode access timestamps "are" but I have no idea what, if any, applications make use of these access times. I see posts all over Google land saying to use "noatime,nodiratime,logbufs=8" for XFS mount options to increase performance. Is there any potential downside to disabling atime? Do daemons such as Dovecot or Samba need these access times updated? Do any applications need this? Thanks. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mounting hixfs (Hitachi "tuned" XFS) on 2.6 kernel, Stan Hoeppner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.33-10843-g8082f34, xfs |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 0/7 V2] Quota tests for XFSQA, Jan Kara |
| Next by Thread: | Re: noatime,nodiratime?, Nicolas KOWALSKI |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |