Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config

xfs

Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config

To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 30 Apr 2010 12:45:43 -0400
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:	<4BDB08C4.6070900@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<4BDA54A4.3040204@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100430164002.GC14107@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BDB08C4.6070900@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:43:48AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Recent testers were slightly confused that a realtime
> mount failed due to missing CONFIG_XFS_RT; we can make
> that a little more obvious.
> 
> V2: drop the else as suggested by Christoph
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config, Eric Sandeen Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config, Christoph Hellwig <=

Previous by Date:	[PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config, Eric Sandeen
Next by Date:	stripe unit/width, inode64, misc mkfs.xfs params, Peter Merelis
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH V2] xfs: be more explicit if RT mount fails due to config, Eric Sandeen
Next by Thread:	Building XFSDump but missing uuid development package, Peter Shuere
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]