xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem
From: Marcin Mirosław <marcin@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:03:37 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mejor.pl; s=cokolwiek; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=yoEhBDSLsVZF1Kdv6BhI3xLQcbK29YWquE/KLow489s=; b=AuNdtamcmkxFuU3PJgryyo3AQC9YL3bIK/WIaB2JfTL2Y/9kFx5MMobYrH9C31w+5WafYgI/CIlWlPamnNBr7OsYn/eLvbzPI7tzFIoG0hCd0q2yNL3L9B7Sr0hAr+6u;
In-reply-to: <20100429020549.GC2512@dastard>
References: <4BD84771.4030804@xxxxxxxx> <20100428230447.GJ9783@dastard> <20100429014312.GA2512@dastard> <4BD8E622.80100@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20100429020549.GC2512@dastard>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100414 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4
W dniu 29.04.2010 04:05, Dave Chinner pisze:
> Yeah, you are right. I was thinking that xfs_db did the feature bit
> modifications, then repair just fixed up the accounting. but repair
> does both in this case. I should remember code that I wrote years
> ago, but for some reason it all seems to be a little bit hazy...
> 
> Let me go look at your repair patch again ;)

Hi,
Eric, Dave, thank you for quick replay and patch. Patch solves problem
for me:)
Regards!
Marcin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>