| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:05:49 +1000 |
| Cc: | Marcin Mirosław <marcin@xxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4BD8E622.80100@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4BD84771.4030804@xxxxxxxx> <20100428230447.GJ9783@dastard> <20100429014312.GA2512@dastard> <4BD8E622.80100@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 08:51:30PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Dave Chinner wrote: > > ... > > > Actually, 3.1.0 was the first release with the fix to xfs_db that > > prevents this problem. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Dave. > > not so sure: Yeah, you are right. I was thinking that xfs_db did the feature bit modifications, then repair just fixed up the accounting. but repair does both in this case. I should remember code that I wrote years ago, but for some reason it all seems to be a little bit hazy... Let me go look at your repair patch again ;) Cheers, dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfsprogs: write both features2 fields when xfs_admin changes lazy_count, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Enabling lazy counters damages filesystem, Marcin MirosÅaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |