xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fwd: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3]

To: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Fwd: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3]
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:46:23 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
FYI...

I asked Keith if he could do xfs nobarrier runs as well.

If there are ext4 nobarrier runs "winning" it seems only fair.  :)

-Eric
--- Begin Message ---
To: "linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Benchmarking data from a raid machine 2.6.34-rc3
From: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:06:18 -0700
List-id: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At long last here is a good data set for filesystem comparison.  It is
from 2.6.34-rc3 (unpatched). It compares ext3 ext4 ext4-nobarrier,
btrfs, btrfs-nocow, xfs and jfs on a software raid setup with a decent
spindle count. 

http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/2010-04-14_2004/2.6.34-rc3/2.6.34-rc3.html


As we know touring barriers off helps a lot with ext4 on this machine.
I think Steve Pratt send some notification to the btrfs folks. Feel free
to point others at this data.


A history from this setup can be found here:  (mostly btrfs related
data)

http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html


I hope to be do these large data set runs once in every major kernel
revision life cycle. 

Thanks,
  Keith Mannthey
  LTC FS-Dev 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--- End Message ---
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>