| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer [bisected: 57817c68229984818fea9e614d6f95249c3fb098] |
| From: | "Hans-Peter Jansen" <hpj@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:42:33 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, opensuse-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100413091823.GD7544@dastard> |
| References: | <201004050049.17952.hpj@xxxxxxxxx> <201004131050.36395.hpj@xxxxxxxxx> <20100413091823.GD7544@dastard> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.10 |
On Tuesday 13 April 2010, 11:18:23 Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:50:35AM +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > > > Dave, may I ask you kindly for briefly elaborating on the worst > > consequences of just reverting this hunk, as I've done before? > > Well, given that is the new shrinker code generating the warnings, > reverting/removing that hunk will render the patch useless :0 Excuse me, I didn't express myself well. I'm after the consequences of applying the revert, that I posted a few messages above. > I'll get you a working 2.6.33 patch tomorrow - it's dinner time > now.... Cool, thanks. Have a nice dinner, Pete |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kernel crash in xfs_iflush_cluster (was Somebody take a look please!...), Janos Haar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PROBLEM + POSS FIX: kernel stack overflow, xfs, many disks, heavy write load, 8k stack, x86-64, John Berthels |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer [bisected: 57817c68229984818fea9e614d6f95249c3fb098], Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.34-rc3: simple du (on a big xfs tree) triggers oom killer [bisected: 57817c68229984818fea9e614d6f95249c3fb098], Hans-Peter Jansen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |