[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.6.34-rc3: inode 0x401afe0 background reclaim flush failed with 11

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc3: inode 0x401afe0 background reclaim flush failed with 11
From: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100413024946.GP2493@dastard>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.01.1004091348010.29272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100413024946.GP2493@dastard>
User-agent: Alpine 2.01 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 12:49, Dave Chinner wrote:
> No.
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/dgc/xfs.git;a=commit;h=7bb6049804717d4aa1f43f2abb50691c0df1d9f2

Ah, thanks. It's not in -rc4 yet, will it be included in the next release?

> > PS: Why is the inode shown in hex and not in decimal? Would something 
> > like this do:
> Because I find that large inode numbers in hex are much easier to
> understand than huge decimal numbers. The inode number is a direct
> encoding of it's location on disk and these days I can generally
> decode them in my head direct from the hex value.

Hehe, OK. Will learn how to do that too :-)

> IOWs, the first
> thing I almost always do when looking at an inode number is convert
> it to hex, so I don't see any point in printing them in decimal...

I was tempted to "find . -inum" to find out which data might be in trouble 
but then noticed that I had to convert it to decimal first.

> e.g. without knowing the geometry of the filesystem, I'd guess that
> inode 0x401afe0 is inode 0x20 (32) of an inode allocation chunk,
> it's AG 2, 4, 8 or 16 (depends on the size of the AGs), and the
> block offset into the AG is 0xd7e (agbno 3454). From that I know a
> lot about the inode - it's the first in an inode cluster buffer and
> the other inodes reported are in the same buffer hence it's only one
> one busy buffer that caused the warnings, the agbno is small so it's
> near the start of the AG so there probably aren't a large number of
> inodes in the filesystem, etc.

Wow, OK. I respectfully withdraw my proposal then. Thanks for the 

BOFH excuse #267:

The UPS is on strike.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>