xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Kernel crash in xfs_iflush_cluster (was Somebody take a look please!

To: Janos Haar <janos.haar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Kernel crash in xfs_iflush_cluster (was Somebody take a look please!...)
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:06:31 +0800
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, axboe@xxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx, kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=mQkcVkKSoEaYOy4YQm+yES5qxAJuduETDTV9Dt27d3E=; b=gpesjeKaGUrnN5Sy6+G5L4JVRDce+TajBF4ZD5kObqLlTRrwZJUS9s0i10BZL5k4U4 Vm3SiUjLg/YLHa5KCj8DIwtfvzspAUTCmDsDOVhZHqjmQEYKJhQn+JFMp8fr3R+tQUDc zCefut9wezQ24ySoPznZUE+cPmZ+7HfVqirdQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=hpnuuJ+l1+rLlAeQUsObNoxionXiB6G+/rH7zsfdfJbNw7njn++ktxITa7/TViZDfz RqWhyadsDi+TOaCzTebcWQrGHsWEvig4pHvC8SpqBtEghEte0c2+PZ5kHMpetFQcD/BH aouLs4tbS7tZC2Lx2mT1HGhHI9XZI2V3lb6Yo=
In-reply-to: <099001cad836$39dc6860$0400a8c0@dcccs>
References: <20100402230905.GW3335@dastard> <22c901cad333$7a67db60$0400a8c0@dcccs> <20100404103701.GX3335@dastard> <2bd101cad4ec$5a425f30$0400a8c0@dcccs> <20100405224522.GZ3335@dastard> <3a5f01cad6c5$8a722c00$0400a8c0@dcccs> <20100408025822.GL11036@dastard> <00bb01cad70d$a814c2c0$0400a8c0@dcccs> <alpine.DEB.2.01.1004091435170.29272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <099001cad836$39dc6860$0400a8c0@dcccs>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:44:28AM +0200, Janos Haar wrote:
> Hello,
>

Hi,

> I am just started to test the stable-queue patch series on 2.6.32.10.
> Now running, we will see...
> The 2.6.33.2 made 4 crashes in the last 3 days. :-(
> This was more worse than the original 2.6.32.10.
>
> (I am very interested, anyway, this is the last shot of this server.
> The owner giving me an ultimate.
> If the server crashes again in the next week, i need to replace the 
> entire HW, the OS, and the services as well...)
>

I would recommend you to use a distribution-released kernel,
rather than a stable kernel from kernel.org, because usually
the distribution maintains a longer supported kernel than
kernel.org.

Just a little suggestion. Hope it helps for you to choose Linux. ;)

Thanks.

-- 
Live like a child, think like the god.
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>