From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Any inode reclaim flush that returns EAGAIN will result in the inode
reclaim being attempted again later. There is no need to issue a
warning into the logs about this situation.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
index 97813e7..5a4731e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
@@ -820,10 +820,10 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
* call into reclaim to find it in a clean state instead of waiting for
* it now. We also don't return errors here - if the error is transient
* then the next reclaim pass will flush the inode, and if the error
- * is permanent then the next sync reclaim will relcaim the inode and
+ * is permanent then the next sync reclaim will reclaim the inode and
* pass on the error.
*/
- if (error && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
+ if (error && error != EAGAIN && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
xfs_fs_cmn_err(CE_WARN, ip->i_mount,
"inode 0x%llx background reclaim flush failed with %d",
(long long)ip->i_ino, error);
--
1.6.5
|