| To: | Linux XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 128TB filesystem limit? |
| From: | pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi) |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:17:03 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003251609160.12435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003251609160.12435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
> I'm working with a raid 0 (md) array on top of 10 16x1TB raid > 6 hardware arrays. fdisk -l shows me 10 drives like [ ... ] I > then did mkfs.xfs /dev/md0 but a df is showing me 128TB [ ... ] A 128Tb single filesystem ontop a 160 drives RAID60! Even better, one made of 10x 14+2 RAID6 components. It shows a dedication to "if it is possible it must make sense" logic and an admirable faith in luck. Perhaps a small discrepancy in size units is not the most interesting aspect of this query. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Always update the log tail on disk in sync, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LIVE AND WORK IN CANADA, G T R A T B T |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 128TB filesystem limit?, david |
| Next by Thread: | xfs_repair 3.0.3 crash and abort, Michael Monnerie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |