| To: | david@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 128TB filesystem limit? |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:06:18 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003251609160.12435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003251609160.12435@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT) vous écriviez:
> is this just rounding error combined with the 1000=1k vs 1024=1k
> marketing stuff, or is there some limit I am bumping into here.
This isn't an xfs limit, I've set up several hundred big xfs FS for
more than 5 years (13 to 76 TB) and never saw that. It must be a bug in
df or elsewhere. What distribution is this? and architecture?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v2.6.33-6351-g68a2ac7, xfs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 128TB filesystem limit?, Steve Costaras |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 128TB filesystem limit?, Steve Costaras |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 128TB filesystem limit?, Steve Costaras |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |