| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: log ticket reservation underestimates the number of iclogs |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:44:35 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100315154154.GA20155@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1268620506-10799-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1268620506-10799-10-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100315154154.GA20155@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
> > + iclog_space = log->l_iclog_size - log->l_iclog_hsize;
> > + num_headers = (unit_bytes + iclog_space - 1) / iclog_space;
> > +
> > + /* for split-recs - ophdrs added when data split over LRs */
> > + unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t) * num_headers;
> > +
> > + /* add extra header reservations if we overrun */
> > + while (!num_headers ||
> > + ((unit_bytes + iclog_space - 1) / iclog_space) > num_headers) {
> > + unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t);
> > + num_headers++;
> > + }
>
> Looks good, but why do you check for a zero num_headers here? The only way
> this could happen after the roundup above is if unit_bytes is zero, which
> can't ever happen - one caller has it hardcoded to 1, and the the other
> has a conditional for it beeing bigger than 0 around the call.
BTW: use of the howmany macro might make some of the above easier
to read.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: log ticket reservation underestimates the number of iclogs, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 0/4] xfs_log_write cleanups and vector support, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: log ticket reservation underestimates the number of iclogs, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 9/9] xfs: log ticket reservation underestimates the number of iclogs, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |