|To:||Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: XFS hang during xfs_fsr run|
|From:||Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:09:36 +0100|
|Cc:||Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<4B8FA2CD.6010904@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100304131511.GH14317@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100304134641.GA26871@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B8FC1B7.3070505@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100304222611.GK14317@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B92C71C.5010003@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100308000601.GF28189@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B94EADD.2080108@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B953D3F.3090002@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4B96118C.6080906@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100309113821.GM28189@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 22.214.171.124 (X11/20090817)|
Not an oops - it's an assertion fail which causes a deliberate trap for debugging.
OK, but is it normal that the load is >=2.0 after that (while the processor is still mostly idle).
That's not what I expected to see. Are you running out of space on your filesystem?
Not even close: # df -h /var Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda4 377G 192G 185G 51% /var cheers, Michael PS: Sorry for the private Mail Dave, the "reply-all-forgetness" bit me ;-)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH 0/9] Log and transaction cleanups, factoring and bug fixes, Dave Chinner|
|Next by Date:||[PATCH] xfstests: fix log filtering in 223's testcase, Dmitry Monakhov|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: XFS hang during xfs_fsr run, Dave Chinner|
|Next by Thread:||Re: XFS hang during xfs_fsr run, Michael Weissenbacher|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|