Re: [PATCH v2] xfsqa: define resblks for tests near ENOSPC

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:03:33PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> Several tests assume a certain amount of disk space free after the
> reserve block pool is filled. Changing the default size of the
> reserve block pool breaks these tests because there is less space
> available that first thought.
> 
> Change these tests to specify a known reserve block pool size of
> 1024 blocks to ensure that they continue to work correctly even if
> the default size changes.

Looks good,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>