xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Stalled xfs_repair on 100TB filesystem

To: Jason Vagalatos <Jason.Vagalatos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Stalled xfs_repair on 100TB filesystem
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:08:31 -0600
Cc: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <DD534F7C25BFA14FB18E6D603135D7EA0A11F91318@sbapexch05>
References: <DD534F7C25BFA14FB18E6D603135D7EA0A11E82ECB@sbapexch05> <4B8DAECA.50701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B8DB0ED.5040109@xxxxxxxxxxx> <DD534F7C25BFA14FB18E6D603135D7EA0A11F91318@sbapexch05>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
Jason Vagalatos wrote:
> We are running xfs_repair v2.9.4.  Will just the -P flag suffice for
> this version?  What is the best way to calculate the bhash size value
> needed if we need to use that option too?

Good, that explains it then; the fix went in after that.

I think -P will suffice.

As for the bhash size ... really not sure.  Doubling it from the default 
is probably sufficient but I haven't really investigated it.

-Eric

> Thanks,
> 
> Jason Vagalatos
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>