| To: | Jason Vagalatos <Jason.Vagalatos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Stalled xfs_repair on 100TB filesystem |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:08:31 -0600 |
| Cc: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <DD534F7C25BFA14FB18E6D603135D7EA0A11F91318@sbapexch05> |
| References: | <DD534F7C25BFA14FB18E6D603135D7EA0A11E82ECB@sbapexch05> <4B8DAECA.50701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B8DB0ED.5040109@xxxxxxxxxxx> <DD534F7C25BFA14FB18E6D603135D7EA0A11F91318@sbapexch05> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Jason Vagalatos wrote: > We are running xfs_repair v2.9.4. Will just the -P flag suffice for > this version? What is the best way to calculate the bhash size value > needed if we need to use that option too? Good, that explains it then; the fix went in after that. I think -P will suffice. As for the bhash size ... really not sure. Doubling it from the default is probably sufficient but I haven't really investigated it. -Eric > Thanks, > > Jason Vagalatos > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Stalled xfs_repair on 100TB filesystem, Jason Vagalatos |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, for-linus, updated. v2.6.33-4132-g525137f, xfs |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Stalled xfs_repair on 100TB filesystem, Jason Vagalatos |
| Next by Thread: | [XFS updates] XFS development tree branch, master, updated. v2.6.33-69-gf1f724e, xfs |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |