xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] commit_metadata export operation v6

To: bpm@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] commit_metadata export operation v6
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:14:25 -0500
Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, aelder@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100222195353.GD10942@xxxxxxx>
References: <20100217200426.13409.32688.stgit@case> <20100220233804.GA15015@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100222195353.GD10942@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:53:53PM -0600, bpm@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hey Bruce,
> 
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:38:04PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:05:05PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > Hey Bruce,
> > > 
> > > Here is the latest version of the knfsd sync changes.  I have addressed 
> > > the
> > > suggestions provided by Christoph, Trond, Dave, and Alex.
> > > 
> > > In this latest version I have fixed up the few nits in the nfsd patch that
> > > Christoph pointed out yesterday.  I also have simplified the xfs patch as
> > > suggested by Dave.
> > 
> > Thanks, applying.
> > 
> > (Do you the second (xfs) patch to go in through the nfsd tree as well,
> > or should that go in through xfs maintainers after the nfsd merge?)
> 
> I chatted with Alex.  It sounds like the best thing is for both patches
> to go in through the nfsd tree since they need to go in order.

OK, thanks, committed.--b.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>