[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_export_operations.commit_metadata

To: bpm@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_export_operations.commit_metadata
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:03:59 -0500
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100212195647.GQ23654@xxxxxxx>
References: <20100211220454.26466.37578.stgit@case> <20100211220505.26466.99037.stgit@case> <1265986006.3201.112.camel@doink1> <20100212174706.GB22633@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100212195647.GQ23654@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 01:56:47PM -0600, bpm@xxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:47:07PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > if we care enough about the returned error.  But Ben is working against
> > the NFS tree which doesn't have that change yet.
> > 
> > We can deal with that by either commiting the old variant to the nfs
> > tree and then leaving sending Stephen a patch to fix it up in -next,
> > or just not apply the xfs commit_metadata implementation yet, and wait
> > for it until both the xfs and nfs trees have hit mainline.

Assuming the xfs tree's something stable, I could also just go ahead and
pull it into the nfsd tree.

(Or we could do it the other way around--as long as when the merge
window opens we try to send the pull requests in the same order.)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>