[Top] [All Lists]

Re: State of XFS on ARM

To: Daniel Goller <morfic@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: State of XFS on ARM
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:46:11 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <13bb8ce11002031234t4b02b199g5b8dfd65ea48aa13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <13bb8ce11002011924h611099feh4955eedcc6e588a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100202112300.GA23809@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <13bb8ce11002021819l7e17dac4n5f58a9887a16fae2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <13bb8ce11002031234t4b02b199g5b8dfd65ea48aa13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090320)
Daniel Goller wrote:
> Any particular stress test you can suggest, to use once i try git for
> xfs on this Marvell box?
> To try to help bringing up issues faster than through normal use of this box?

Run it through the xfstests suite:


(I have a sheevaplug too, thanks to some nice folks @Marvell, and
I really need to get regular qa going on it in return... have been
too busy so far) :(

There's a readme in the tree, but basically just create a local.config like:

#        - setenv TEST_DEV "device containing TEST PARTITION"
#        - setenv TEST_DIR "mount point of TEST PARTITION"
#        - setenv SCRATCH_DEV "device containing SCRATCH PARTITION"
#        - setenv SCRATCH_MNT "mount point for SCRATCH PARTITION"


mkfs.xfs $TEST_DEV, and then run

#./check -g auto


> Thanks in advance for any suggestions,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>