xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: State of XFS on ARM

To: Daniel Goller <morfic@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: State of XFS on ARM
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:38:33 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <13bb8ce11002031234t4b02b199g5b8dfd65ea48aa13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <13bb8ce11002011924h611099feh4955eedcc6e588a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100202112300.GA23809@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <13bb8ce11002021819l7e17dac4n5f58a9887a16fae2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <13bb8ce11002031234t4b02b199g5b8dfd65ea48aa13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:34:43PM -0600, Daniel Goller wrote:
> Any particular stress test you can suggest, to use once i try git for
> xfs on this Marvell box?
> To try to help bringing up issues faster than through normal use of this box?

The primary use of the large buffers where this matters is the log.
So you just need to cleanly unmount and mount the filesystem again,
and the issues your previously reported should be gone.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>