xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: Use delayed write for inodes rather than async

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: Use delayed write for inodes rather than async
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:59:11 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100126161045.GB24152@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1264400564-19704-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1264400564-19704-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100125115308.GC8595@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100125223140.GN25842@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100126161045.GB24152@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:10:45AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Also in this context
> > > the requeue label name doesn't fit too well, even if it's the same
> > > action as the requeue.
> > 
> > I'm open to suggestions for a better name ;)
> 
> What do you think about this version?

Yeah, that looks a lot better. I'll incorporate that into the
patch. Thanks.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/7] xfs: Use delayed write for inodes rather than async, Dave Chinner <=