| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 2/2] xfs: use scalable vmap API |
| From: | Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:38:19 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20100125213403.GA1309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20081021082542.GA6974@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081021082735.GB6974@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081021120932.GB13348@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081022093018.GD4359@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100119121505.GA9428@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100125075445.GD19664@laptop> <20100125081750.GA20012@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100125083309.GF19664@laptop> <20100125123746.GA24406@laptop> <20100125213403.GA1309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 04:34:03PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:37:46PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 07:33:09PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > Any easy way to get them? Sorry, not uptodate on your new vmalloc > > > > implementation anymore. > > > > > > Let me try writing a few (tested) patches here first that I can send you. > > > > Well is it easy to reproduce the vmap failure? Here is a better tested > > patch if you can try it. It fixes a couple of bugs and does some purging > > of fragmented blocks. > > So far I've not run out of vmalloc space yet with quite a few xfstests > iterations and not encountered any other problems either. > > Thanks for looking into this! OK thanks for testing. I'll send it upstream if you haven't had any problems so far. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Secret Shopper  Position Available, Gen Wilson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: Automatic build dependency calculations, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 2/2] xfs: use scalable vmap API, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 2/2] xfs: use scalable vmap API, Nick Piggin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |