xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: acl build failure on x86_64

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: acl build failure on x86_64
From: Jon Grosshart <jgrosshart@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:50:04 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=W4PSy1cfsqWYw2i0gI2e5GrrfS8vunUElvgVklnF7+Q=; b=uVEmjAkD5noglrD6IGiGbt9UkhRZNImOtbyYVAQYhBP9fnQBa3VTY96M47Ltfp8zgf FqpKA5WNKe48JErkOAq56qKN+Sel5gsw5L7POmb1qRnr1pffFLIhwyijl6dblK99oxM4 ZNHNUlDnCGphCMGo3vlDXOZkkJoxpC6pb/LcU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wjkbXsu+ih9JO/801OvIfW0tAQJWJCgqS5PoWYIwmYqyQBpXVlz8CCXyBYB/cTjVMW m7smBnXVZzBG3AvA2+z6BUdBBiKwXe1KfrgfDxGKzqMwdQP4L7RFLz15NmzoLvmccfNW YJoyDsVsZph7wVEymTgQ94724mkwrDeBK0hA0=
In-reply-to: <9cf823c61001200629x5be69ea3t6fca943a9b0844f3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4B5578E0.5000201@xxxxxxxxx> <1067945374.1918531263959691412.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9cf823c61001200629x5be69ea3t6fca943a9b0844f3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Also, on a side note, would be nice from a packagers stand point to
have the attached DESTDIR patch applied to both acl and attr......

Thanks again Nathan.

Attachment: acl-destdir.patch
Description: Binary data

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>