| To: | Gim Leong Chin <chingimleong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: allocsize mount option |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:42:11 -0600 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <264613.60659.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <264613.60659.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) |
Gim Leong Chin wrote: > Hi Dave, > > >> fragmented, it just means that that there are 19% more fragments >> than the ideal. In 4TB of data with 1GB sized files, that would >> mean there are 4800 extents (average length ~800MB, which is >> excellent) instead of the perfect 4000 extents (@1GB each). Hence >> you can see how misleading this "19% fragmentation" number can be >> on an extent based filesystem... > > There are many files that are 128 GB. > > When I did the tests with dd on this computer, the 20 GB files had up > to > 50 extents. which is at least 400mb per extent, which is really not so bad. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: allocsize mount option, Gim Leong Chin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [PATCH 0/10] Perag lookup rework, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: allocsize mount option, Gim Leong Chin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: allocsize mount option, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |