[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: ca

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim)
From: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:22:26 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100108113114.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <89c4f90c0910270341r7833f490g60810f2817eb0950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091030101601.GA11142@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AF0422D.1070104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091114162126.GB17658@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B0A8075.8080008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091211115932.GA20632@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B3F9F88.9030307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100107110446.GA13802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B45CFAC.4000607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100108113114.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
Hi Dave,

Just wanted to let you know we are running a few servers with your patches. So far so good, but it's a but too early to conclude anything.

Thanks for the patches. I'll keep you posted on our results.


On 8-1-2010 12:31, Dave Chinner wrote:
Hi Patrick,

I've attached two compendium patches that will hopefully fix
the inode reclaim problems you've been seeing - one is for 2.6.31,
the other is for 2.6.32. I've cc'd this to the XFS list ѕo that
anyone else who has been seeing crashes, assert failures and
general nastiness around inode reclaim can test them as well.

These are not final patches - there's a few changes that Christoph
has picked up on during review - so there'll be another round of
patches before checkins and -stable backports can be requested.

I'm hoping that these patches fix your problem, because with them
I can't make my machines fall over anymore....



xfs mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>