xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: Avoid inodes in reclaim when flushing from inode ca

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xfs: Avoid inodes in reclaim when flushing from inode cache
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:19:14 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1263167508-9346-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1263167508-9346-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1263167508-9346-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:51:46AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> THe reclaim code will handle flushing of dirty inodes before
> reclaim occurs, so avoid them when determining whether an inode is
> a candidate for flushing to disk when walking the radix trees.
> This is based on a test patch from Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,


Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>