On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:41:12 -0600 Alex Elder wrote:
> Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:55:12PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:26:10 -0600 Alex Elder wrote:
> >>> One more XFS update for -rc1, now that the new XFS tracing code has
> >>> been committed.
> >> Sorry if I have missed it, but have the printk format warnings
> >> on i386 builds been fixed?
> > I don't see any here w/ gcc 4.3.4 x86-64 compiling i386 kernels....
> I didn't get them either when I built in my environment.
> Dave, your patch looks good to me, and Randy has acked it
> so I'm going to pull it into our XFS top-of-tree. I'll
> hold off sending yet another pull request to Linus for
> now. Thanks for addressing it quickly.
Dave's patch is now needed in Linus's mainline kernel tree...
> > /me hates gcc's warning inconsistencies with a passion.
> >> e.g.:
> >> In file included from linux-next-20091216/include/trace/ftrace.h:398,
> >> from linux-next-20091216/include/trace/define_trace.h:69,
> >> from
> >> linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.h:1369,
> >> from linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.c:75:
> >> linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/./xfs_trace.h: In function
> >> 'ftrace_raw_output_id_xfs_iomap_enter':
> >> linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/./xfs_trace.h:830:
> >> warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument
> >> 12 has type
> >> 'xfs_fsblock_t'
> > Patch that should fix this below.
> > Cheers,
> > Dave.