xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: benchmark results

To: lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: benchmark results
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:06:45 +0900 (JST)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ext3-users@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.01.0912240205510.3483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.01.0912240205510.3483@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:31:10 -0800 (PST), Christian Kujau wrote:
> I've had the chance to use a testsystem here and couldn't resist running a 
> few benchmark programs on them: bonnie++, tiobench, dbench and a few 
> generic ones (cp/rm/tar/etc...) on ext{234}, btrfs, jfs, ufs, xfs, zfs.
> 
> All with standard mkfs/mount options and +noatime for all of them.
> 
> Here are the results, no graphs - sorry:
>    http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-22/
> 
> Reiserfs is locking up during dbench, so I removed it from the 
> config, here are some earlier results:
> 
>    http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2009-12-21/bonnie.html
> 
> Bonnie++ couldn't complete on nilfs2, only the generic tests 
> and tiobench were run.

I looked at the log but couldn't identify the error.
Is that a disk full?

Thanks,
Ryusuke Konishi


> As nilfs2, ufs, zfs aren't supporting xattr, dbench 
> could not be run on these filesystems.
>    
> Short summary, AFAICT:
>     - btrfs, ext4 are the overall winners
>     - xfs to, but creating/deleting many files was *very* slow
>     - if you need only fast but no cool features or journaling, ext2
>       is still a good choice :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Christian.
> -- 
> BOFH excuse #84:
> 
> Someone is standing on the ethernet cable, causing a kink in the cable
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nilfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>