[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime

To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime
From: Jean-Pierre André <jean-pierre.andre@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:28:52 +0100
Cc: Eric Blake <ebb9@xxxxxxx>, fuse-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87my1aevro.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4B2B156D.9040604@xxxxxxx> <87aaxclr4q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B2F7421.10005@xxxxxxx> <4B2F7A95.3010708@xxxxxxx> <87hbrkjrk8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B304D04.6040501@xxxxxxx> <87d427jscr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B3097C4.3060803@xxxxxxxxxx> <874onjjnln.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B30B67A.7080703@xxxxxxxxxx> <87ljgvi1an.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B30F0C9.2020702@xxxxxxxxxx> <87my1aevro.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091027 Fedora/2.0-7.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
I suggest I port Miklos patch to fuse-lite soon,
and delay the low-level case (and microsecond
precision) until January. Does that suit your needs ?
Thanks. Sounds good. I'm not using ntfs-3g actually, I just bridged the
bug report on lkml to others. Eric?

As my Christmas present to any real non-bridging
user, here is, ahead of schedule, the patch for the
low level fuse interface of ntfs-3g.

The good news is that for this interface, no update
of fuse is needed. So there is no compilation issue with
unpatched versions of fuse, and the attached patch
is independent of the one for the high-level interface
posted previously, except for the configuration.ac file
for which I duplicate the patch.



Attachment: lowutimensat.patch
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>