[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime

To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime
From: Jean-Pierre André <jean-pierre.andre@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:43:25 +0100
Cc: Eric Blake <ebb9@xxxxxxx>, fuse-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87my1aevro.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4B2B156D.9040604@xxxxxxx> <87aaxclr4q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B2F7421.10005@xxxxxxx> <4B2F7A95.3010708@xxxxxxx> <87hbrkjrk8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B304D04.6040501@xxxxxxx> <87d427jscr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B3097C4.3060803@xxxxxxxxxx> <874onjjnln.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B30B67A.7080703@xxxxxxxxxx> <87ljgvi1an.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B30F0C9.2020702@xxxxxxxxxx> <87my1aevro.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091027 Fedora/2.0-7.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
I suggest I port Miklos patch to fuse-lite soon,
and delay the low-level case (and microsecond
precision) until January. Does that suit your needs ?
Thanks. Sounds good. I'm not using ntfs-3g actually, I just bridged the
bug report on lkml to others. Eric?

Attached is a proposed patch for selective update
of timestamps in ntfs-3g (based on the release
candidate version ntfs-3g-2009.11.14AC.2).

It includes the backport of Miklos's patch posted
yesterday to fuse-lite. As a matter of fact fuse-lite
is needed, because I do not know how to make this
compile with unpatched fuse.

Note : this does not yet include  sub-second precision.



Attachment: utimensat.patch
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>