[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1

To: "Dave Chinner" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1
From: "Alex Elder" <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:41:12 -0600
Cc: <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20091217002007.GF4850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Acp+rtLinScZ3n6tRT+GK2bBC3GDjQAG4H0A
Thread-topic: [GIT PULL] XFS update for 2.6.33-rc1
Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:55:12PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:26:10 -0600 Alex Elder wrote:
>>> One more XFS update for -rc1, now that the new XFS tracing code has
>>> been committed.
>> Sorry if I have missed it, but have the printk format warnings
>> on i386 builds been fixed?
> I don't see any here w/ gcc 4.3.4 x86-64 compiling i386 kernels....

I didn't get them either when I built in my environment.

Dave, your patch looks good to me, and Randy has acked it
so I'm going to pull it into our XFS top-of-tree.  I'll
hold off sending yet another pull request to Linus for
now.  Thanks for addressing it quickly.


> /me hates gcc's warning inconsistencies with a passion.
>> e.g.:
>> In file included from linux-next-20091216/include/trace/ftrace.h:398,
>>                  from linux-next-20091216/include/trace/define_trace.h:69,
>>                  from linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.h:1369,
>>                  from linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_trace.c:75:
>> linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/./xfs_trace.h: In function
>> 'ftrace_raw_output_id_xfs_iomap_enter': 
>> linux-next-20091216/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/./xfs_trace.h:830:
>> warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 
>> 12 has type
>> 'xfs_fsblock_t'  
> Patch that should fix this below.
> Cheers,
> Dave.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>