| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS and DPX files |
| From: | Michael Weissenbacher <mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:49:51 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <hg5oeo$bh2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4AEC2CF4.8040703@xxxxxxx> <200911021205.28006@xxxxxx> <200911022258.35164@xxxxxx> <hg5oeo$bh2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Hi! > > I've been under the impression that "modern disks" (TM), at minimum the > server-type products, are supposed to re-use the remaining spin-energy > for generating the required power and thus writing the content of their > on-disk write cache to the disks. > Nope, they don't. All disks do is use the remaining spin energy to mechanically park the disk heads. Server-grade disks should always ship with their drive write cache turned off per default. The only thing possible imho would be a small ssd on disk for the cache, but no disk manufacturer does this either. cya, Michael |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Upgrade Your Webmail Account ....!!!!, Webmail Account |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: cleanup bmap extent state macros, Alex Elder |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS and DPX files, Martin Spott |
| Next by Thread: | Upgrade Your Webmail Account ....!!!!, Webmail Account |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |