| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Disappointing performance of copy (MD raid + XFS) |
| From: | Asdo <asdo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:57:39 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4B204334.1000605@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4B204334.1000605@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) |
Asdo wrote: and I think I have seen around 10MB/sec when they are of 500KB (this transfer at 10MB/sec was in parallel with another faster one however).Yes I definitely confirm: right now I have just 1 rsync copy running, it's in a zone where files are around 500KB on average, and it's going at 9 MB/sec. Stack traces of the writer process conform to what I have posted in my previous email, even now that the writer is the only process using the destination array. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Disappointing performance of copy (MD raid + XFS), Asdo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Disappointing performance of copy (MD raid + XFS), Asdo |
| Previous by Thread: | Disappointing performance of copy (MD raid + XFS), Asdo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Disappointing performance of copy (MD raid + XFS), Asdo |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |