[Top] [All Lists]

[BUG report]xfs_btree_make_block_unfull generated an OOPS

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BUG report]xfs_btree_make_block_unfull generated an OOPS
From: hank peng <pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:58:44 +0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=dux4rE+kApNwbmfi1eamYPG5QMIbuPE+4upIGyk76vM=; b=IeWGnMGTZp186d0LOvWOthgs94N/wgi8uGGtgy/YN2nnK+PoN54qFM/dOQf/kpwP3W 4yEbujjdjHQuTJ8N468p2FqzC5Z8PAvxi1y7cZ6gLgQ5T9E9fNonuMDuzGHTftK1Qd7V KKgYzFMb1s8H6S1nPhiN6FrgEPnADEoC+V3QU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TZ5zg8kaJALFvRoeYnXXTxFg27iVg91x1kPfOLK6oT27Cp8CveYFMgdAdrikNRaiT1 rZyDQbmlU1XFvyZy3+gwDtVQg0qkPvxQ6EOe9ynE1jJFHGZ4f8QONoqfOPmaDFu07Rz6 RDxHYk5I5+FvIQix1oEZEuVaTEOrjgfFkWqSU=
Hi, all:
I think it is a BUG, so I report it here.
root@1234dahua:~# uname -a
Linux 1234dahua #14 Tue Dec 8 16:48:40 CST 2009 ppc unknown

Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000000
Faulting instruction address: 0xc019ea28
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
Modules linked in:
NIP: c019ea28 LR: c019ea00 CTR: 00000000
REGS: e233baf0 TRAP: 0300   Not tainted  (
MSR: 00029000 <EE,ME,CE>  CR: 22008484  XER: 00000000
DEAR: 00000000, ESR: 00800000
TASK = e8add2c0[21249] 'SS_Server' THREAD: e233a000
GPR00: 000001a4 e233bba0 e8add2c0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000
GPR08: c0e22478 e20137b8 c0e2247c 000001a4 22008422 1016d410 3fff5400 100a0000
GPR16: 100ce108 00000000 006398bb e20137b8 c019c58c 00029000 e233bc5c c0186bd0
GPR24: c019c568 00000000 22008424 e233bc08 00000000 e233bc58 00000000 e20137b8
NIP [c019ea28] xfs_btree_make_block_unfull+0xc4/0x1b0
LR [c019ea00] xfs_btree_make_block_unfull+0x9c/0x1b0
Call Trace:
[e233bba0] [c019ea00] xfs_btree_make_block_unfull+0x9c/0x1b0 (unreliable)
[e233bbe0] [c019ee88] xfs_btree_insrec+0x374/0x4b0
[e233bc50] [c019f040] xfs_btree_insert+0x7c/0x1c0
[e233bcb0] [c0185ad0] xfs_free_ag_extent+0x34c/0x810
[e233bd20] [c0186668] xfs_free_extent+0xdc/0x104
[e233bdb0] [c018f350] xfs_bmap_finish+0x154/0x1a0
[e233bde0] [c01b5e34] xfs_itruncate_finish+0x254/0x3b8
[e233be60] [c01d033c] xfs_free_eofblocks+0x254/0x29c
[e233bee0] [c01d9ba8] xfs_file_release+0x14/0x28
[e233bef0] [c009574c] __fput+0xe8/0x1dc
[e233bf10] [c0092048] filp_close+0x70/0xb0
[e233bf30] [c009211c] sys_close+0x94/0xc0
[e233bf40] [c000f784] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x3c
Instruction dump:
7fa5eb78 4bffdf59 7c7c1b79 40a2ffd4 801d0000 2f800000 419e0064 57c9103a
7f83e378 7d29fa14 80090050 90170000 <90190000> 80010044 bae1001c 38210040
---[ end trace 069fbb7d042289d2 ]---

According to the above call trace, I checked the source code and found
that it may be invoked by xfs_btree_make_block_unfull function in

2642         if (*stat) {
2643                 *oindex = *index = cur->bc_ptrs[level];
2644                 return 0;
2645         }

here, oindex is NULL so OOPs occured. I am not a xfs hacker, I hope
someone can help me fix this BUG, if you need more information, let me

The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>